The video compares the AI models Gemini Pro 2.5 and Optimus Alpha, highlighting Gemini’s superior functionality, speed, and human-like output in generating content, while Optimus Alpha struggles with responsiveness but excels in research accuracy. Ultimately, the host declares Gemini 2.5 the winner with a score of 3-1, promoting their community, Applied AI, for those interested in learning more about AI technology.
In the video, the host compares two AI models: Gemini Pro 2.5 and Optimus Alpha, which is speculated to be a version of ChatGPT-5. The comparison begins with a 3D color simulator game, where Gemini 2.5 is shown to have better functionality, allowing for more movement and exploration compared to the limited capabilities of Optimus Alpha. The host notes that while Gemini performs well in this test, Optimus Alpha appears to have a more visually appealing output, though it is hindered by its restrictive controls.
The host then conducts a speed test by asking both models to generate ten vegan recipes for kids under two years old. Gemini 2.5 quickly outpaces Optimus Alpha, which is described as being painfully slow during the process. This speed advantage leads the host to conclude that Gemini 2.5 is superior in terms of responsiveness and efficiency when generating content.
Next, the host requests both models to create an email summary of the recipes. In this instance, Gemini 2.5 again demonstrates a more human-like quality in its output, while Optimus Alpha’s response is flagged as being heavily AI-generated. The host uses a detection tool to analyze the human-like quality of the text, revealing that Optimus Alpha’s output is 96% AI, while Gemini’s is only 22%, further solidifying Gemini’s edge in this comparison.
The video also explores the research capabilities of both models, with the host enabling web search to inquire about the latest news. Gemini 2.5 struggles to provide relevant information, while Optimus Alpha manages to deliver a more accurate response regarding recent developments. This aspect highlights that while Gemini excels in certain tasks, Optimus Alpha may have strengths in coding and research-related queries.
In conclusion, the host summarizes the results of the comparisons, declaring Gemini 2.5 the overall winner with a score of 3-1 against Optimus Alpha. The video wraps up with a promotion for the host’s community, Applied AI, which offers resources, templates, and a supportive environment for those interested in learning about AI and its applications. The host encourages viewers to join the community to enhance their understanding and skills in AI technology.