ScarJo is Pissed at OpenAI For Using Her Voice #openai #gpt4o

Scarlett Johansson expressed displeasure with OpenAI for using a voice similar to hers without consent, stemming from her role in the movie “Her.” The incident highlights ethical concerns about replicating celebrity voices in AI technologies and underscores the importance of obtaining explicit consent and respecting individual rights in such projects.

Scarlett Johansson recently expressed her dissatisfaction with OpenAI for utilizing a voice that closely resembles hers. In the past, Johansson had portrayed the voice of an AI assistant in the movie “Her.” OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, aimed to leverage this connection by having their new AI assistant sound like Scarlett Johansson. Altman believed that her voice could help bridge the gap between technology companies and creatives, making consumers more at ease with the evolving role of humans in AI.

Despite Altman’s proposal, Scarlett Johansson declined to lend her voice to OpenAI’s project. However, during a recent demo by OpenAI where a voice named “Sky” was featured, many listeners perceived the voice to be strikingly similar to Scarlett Johansson’s. This caused a backlash from Johansson, who was upset that OpenAI had essentially used a voice that closely resembled hers without her consent. As a result of the controversy, OpenAI decided to remove the voice from their project.

The use of a voice resembling Scarlett Johansson without her permission upset the actress, who felt it was an infringement on her likeness and voice. This incident highlighted the ethical considerations surrounding the use of AI-generated voices that closely mimic real individuals, especially without their explicit approval. Johansson’s objection to OpenAI’s actions reflects a broader concern about the boundaries and implications of using celebrity voices in AI technology.

The controversy surrounding OpenAI’s use of a voice similar to Scarlett Johansson’s underscores the challenges and complexities involved in developing AI technologies that replicate human voices. It raises questions about consent, intellectual property rights, and the ethical implications of creating AI systems that closely mimic real individuals. The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of respecting individuals’ voices and identities in the development and deployment of AI technologies.

Ultimately, the situation between Scarlett Johansson and OpenAI sheds light on the need for clear guidelines and ethical standards when it comes to using celebrity voices in AI projects. It emphasizes the importance of obtaining explicit consent and respecting individuals’ rights over their own voices and likeness. Moving forward, it is crucial for technology companies like OpenAI to consider these ethical considerations and ensure that they uphold the principles of consent and respect in their AI development endeavors.