AGI will be controlled by the government

The text discusses the likelihood of governments, rather than private companies, controlling Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) when it reaches a superintelligent level. It emphasizes the need for strong regulatory frameworks, international collaboration, and governance structures to ensure responsible development and control of AGI technology, highlighting the potential security risks associated with government involvement.

The text discusses the development and control of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), emphasizing the role of governments in this process. It argues that discussions around AGI often focus on private AI labs, underestimating the likelihood of government involvement. The text suggests that when AGI reaches a level of superintelligence, it is more probable for it to be controlled by governments rather than private companies. The scenario presented envisions a future where governments, with a cluster of superintelligent scientists, could potentially have the power to hack systems and data centers, posing a significant security risk.

Furthermore, the text challenges the idea that AGI development will be decentralized and led by private entities. It points out that the immense power and potential risks associated with AGI make it more likely to be managed by governments rather than corporations. The comparison is drawn to nuclear weapons, highlighting how institutions, constitutions, and laws are used to control and regulate such powerful technologies, rather than leaving them in private hands.

The text also raises concerns about security in a scenario where AGI is developed by private labs. It suggests that the security measures implemented by private companies may not be sufficient to prevent unauthorized access or misuse of AGI technology. The mention of China, Russia, and North Korea as potential players in the AGI development landscape further underscores the need for robust security protocols and international cooperation to prevent misuse of AGI capabilities.

Overall, the text paints a picture of a future where AGI development is likely to be dominated by governments rather than private entities. It highlights the need for strong regulatory frameworks and international collaboration to ensure the responsible development and control of AGI technology. The central argument is that the immense power and potential risks associated with AGI necessitate governance structures that prioritize security, accountability, and ethical considerations.