The video dives into the capabilities of the newly released AI image generator, FLUX 1.1 Pro, which is touted as the best in the market. The presenter showcases various platforms where users can access FLUX 1.1 Pro, such as Together.AI, RubberBand.com, and EverArt, among others. Each platform offers different credit systems for generating images, with Together.AI providing a free $5 credit for new users. The video emphasizes the simplicity of using FLUX 1.1 Pro, allowing users to input prompts without the need for complex settings.
The presenter begins testing FLUX 1.1 Pro by generating images based on simple prompts. Initial results show that while the images are clearly AI-generated, they exhibit a polished and professional look, often with overly perfect features and blurry backgrounds. The video introduces a clever trick where users can simulate amateur photography by using specific file formats in their prompts, resulting in images that appear more realistic and less polished. This technique proves effective for generating images that resemble low-quality photos taken by everyday individuals.
As the video progresses, the presenter tests various prompts, including more detailed and complex scenarios. While FLUX 1.1 Pro performs well with simple prompts, it struggles with more intricate requests, often producing images that still look too perfect or unrealistic. The presenter compares FLUX 1.1 Pro’s outputs with those from other leading image generators like MidJourney and Ideogram, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each. The results show that while FLUX 1.1 Pro excels in certain areas, it still has room for improvement, particularly in generating hands and fingers accurately.
The video also explores the potential of FLUX 1.1 Pro to create images in different styles, such as watercolor paintings and anime. The results are generally positive, with the AI successfully capturing the essence of the requested styles. However, the presenter notes that the background often remains overly realistic, detracting from the intended artistic effect. The comparison with other image generators reveals that FLUX 1.1 Pro holds its own, but there are instances where competitors produce more fitting results for specific styles.
In conclusion, the video highlights the impressive advancements of FLUX 1.1 Pro, particularly in speed and image quality compared to its predecessor, FLUX 1 Pro. The presenter shares insights from an independent evaluation that ranks FLUX 1.1 Pro as the top image generator based on user preferences. The video encourages viewers to experiment with the unique prompting techniques discussed, such as using file formats to achieve realistic amateur photos. Overall, the video serves as a comprehensive overview of FLUX 1.1 Pro’s capabilities, limitations, and potential for future developments in AI-generated imagery.
