The video discusses a supposed leak related to OpenAI’s new model, referred to as “strawberry,” which is seen as a minor improvement rather than a significant advancement in AI capabilities. The host expresses skepticism about claims of achieving “level two” reasoning, highlighting inconsistencies in the models’ performance on basic tasks and emphasizing the need for concrete benchmarks.
The video discusses recent developments surrounding OpenAI and a supposed leak referred to as “strawberry,” which is believed to be related to a new model called “sus column R” (x.com). The host highlights the ongoing speculation on social media about these developments, noting that OpenAI has a history of overpromising and underdelivering. The “strawberry” leak is suggested to be a minor improvement in prompting strategies rather than a groundbreaking advancement in AI capabilities.
The host mentions a tweet from Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, which hints at the company achieving “level two” problem-solving and reasoning capabilities. However, the video emphasizes that there are no concrete benchmarks or data to support these claims, leaving much of the discussion in the realm of speculation. The host encourages viewers to pay attention to the differences in behavior between the new model and previous iterations, particularly in how they handle reasoning tasks.
Throughout the video, the host conducts various tests on the models, comparing their performance on simple math problems and reasoning questions. The results reveal inconsistencies in the models’ responses, suggesting that they struggle with basic reasoning tasks. For instance, the models often provide incorrect answers to straightforward questions, indicating that they may not possess the level of reasoning that OpenAI claims.
The video also touches on the performance of competing AI models, such as Google’s Gemini and Anthropic’s Claude, which seem to handle similar tasks more effectively. The host points out that while some models excel in verbal reasoning and philosophical discussions, they still fall short in basic arithmetic and comprehension tasks. This inconsistency raises questions about the true capabilities of the new models being discussed.
In conclusion, the host expresses skepticism about the hype surrounding the “strawberry” leak and the claims of achieving level two reasoning. They emphasize the need for tangible progress and reliable benchmarks rather than speculative excitement. The video invites viewers to share their thoughts on the developments, highlighting a desire for more substantial advancements in AI technology rather than mere hype.