Marjorie Taylor Greene criticizes a clause in the “One Big Beautiful Bill” that would prevent states from regulating AI for ten years, arguing that federalism is essential for innovation, local control, and national security. She warns that federal overreach could hinder technological progress, weaken economic independence, and undermine America’s ability to compete globally, urging the bill’s opponents to preserve state rights.
In the video, Marjorie Taylor Greene passionately criticizes a specific clause in the “One Big Beautiful Bill” that would prohibit states from regulating or making laws about artificial intelligence (AI) for ten years. She emphasizes the importance of federalism, arguing that states should retain the authority to oversee and regulate industries within their borders to protect their citizens and adapt to local needs. Greene warns that removing this power from states could undermine the foundational principles of the United States and hinder the country’s ability to respond effectively to technological developments.
Greene expresses concern about the rapid development of AI technology and the unpredictable future it holds. She highlights that AI has advanced significantly in recent years and will continue to do so in the coming years. She believes that federal overreach in this area could stifle innovation and prevent states from creating favorable environments for tech companies to grow and compete. Instead, she advocates for states to foster innovation by making their jurisdictions attractive for AI and tech industries, similar to how other industries have historically been encouraged to develop within specific states.
The congresswoman also addresses the broader geopolitical context, particularly the competition with China. She argues that American tech and AI companies can and should compete globally without sacrificing federalism. Greene suggests that states can create friendly environments for these industries, which would help the U.S. maintain technological leadership without the need for federal mandates that could limit state authority. She emphasizes that protecting federalism allows for a more balanced and effective approach to economic and technological competition.
Greene further discusses the importance of self-reliance and economic independence, especially in relation to China. She criticizes the reliance on China for critical supplies such as processed food, medicines, and manufacturing, warning that dependence on foreign countries could lead to conflict or war. She advocates for domestic innovation and production to secure supply chains and reduce the risk of future conflicts. Greene underscores that avoiding war and ensuring national security should be priorities, and that maintaining federalism is essential to achieving these goals.
In conclusion, Greene urges her colleagues to oppose the clause in the bill that would limit state regulation of AI. She calls for the bill to focus on issues like tax policy, border security, and protecting Americans, rather than allowing AI to be unregulated and potentially harmful. She advocates for preserving federalism as a means to foster innovation, protect national interests, and ensure a strong, self-reliant America. Greene concludes by urging the Senate to remove the problematic clause and emphasizes the importance of safeguarding state rights for the future of the country.