In the video, the user expresses frustration with the O3-mini coding assistant, which repeatedly claims to implement code changes but fails to do so, resulting in a confusing and inefficient coding process. The assistant’s inconsistent responses and reliance on providing code diffs instead of directly integrating changes left the user feeling stuck and dissatisfied compared to other coding tools.
In the video, the user shares their frustrating experience with the O3-mini coding assistant. They describe a series of interactions where the assistant repeatedly claims to update the code but fails to implement the changes effectively. The user highlights the lack of coherence in the assistant’s responses, which leads to a confusing and inefficient coding process.
The user recounts a specific instance where the assistant suggested testing a button after making updates. After confirming that the button worked, the user requested to store the data, only to be met with a series of prompts from the assistant indicating it would apply changes but not actually executing them. This back-and-forth created a sense of annoyance as the user felt stuck in a loop of unfulfilled promises.
As the user continued to interact with the O3-mini, they noted that the assistant would often say it would apply changes but then revert to previous states without actually implementing any of the requested modifications. This inconsistency made it difficult for the user to trust the assistant’s capabilities, as they were left with an incomplete codebase and unresolved tasks.
The user also mentioned that the assistant sometimes provided code in the form of a diff, which is a comparison of changes rather than integrating those changes directly into the codebase. This approach added to the user’s frustration, as they had to manually request the assistant to add the changes, which it still failed to do effectively.
Overall, the video illustrates a significant user experience issue with the O3-mini coding assistant. The user’s attempts to streamline their coding process were hindered by the assistant’s inability to follow through on its promises, leading to a chaotic and unproductive interaction. The user expresses a desire for a more reliable and efficient coding tool, contrasting their experience with the O3-mini to other coding environments like Cursor.