‘The cost of compute is far beyond the costs of the employees’: Nvidia executive says right now AI is more expensive than paying human workers

Nvidia executive Bryan Catanzaro and recent studies highlight that current AI compute costs far exceed human labor expenses, making AI adoption more of a strategic investment than a cost-saving measure. Despite massive investments and ongoing tech layoffs, AI’s economic viability depends on significant reductions in operational costs, improved reliability, and better integration before it can effectively replace human workers at scale.

Nvidia’s vice president of applied deep learning, Bryan Catanzaro, recently highlighted that the current cost of AI compute resources significantly exceeds the cost of employing human workers. Despite widespread tech layoffs and the perception that AI is replacing human labor, the reality is that AI tools remain more expensive to operate than maintaining a human workforce. This insight challenges the common narrative that AI adoption is primarily a cost-saving measure for companies. Instead, many firms are investing heavily in AI despite the higher costs, driven by long-term strategic goals rather than immediate financial savings.

Supporting Catanzaro’s observation, a 2024 MIT study found that AI automation is economically viable in only about 23% of jobs where visual tasks are central. For the majority of roles, it remains cheaper to employ humans. Additionally, AI systems have shown vulnerabilities, such as incidents where AI agents caused significant operational damage due to errors or overuse. These issues underscore the current limitations of AI technology in reliably replacing human labor and the ongoing need for human oversight.

Despite the lack of clear evidence that AI is boosting productivity or displacing jobs on a large scale, Big Tech companies continue to pour massive investments into AI development. Morgan Stanley reports that capital expenditures on AI have surged to $740 billion in 2026, a 69% increase from the previous year. This surge in spending has led some companies, like Uber, to reconsider their budgets as AI-related costs quickly exceed initial projections. Meanwhile, the tech sector has experienced over 92,000 layoffs in 2026, indicating a complex relationship between AI investment and workforce reductions.

Experts like Keith Lee from the Swiss Institute of Artificial Intelligence’s Gordon School of Business explain that the high costs of AI stem from expensive hardware and energy requirements. AI spending could reach trillions of dollars by 2030, driven by data center and IT equipment costs. Moreover, many AI companies use flat subscription pricing models that do not adequately cover the operating expenses for heavy users, prompting a reevaluation of AI as a complementary tool rather than a direct labor replacement until cost structures improve.

Looking ahead, the economic viability of AI depends on significant reductions in operational costs and improvements in reliability. Analyst firm Gartner predicts that the cost of performing inference on large language models could drop by over 90% within four years. Additionally, AI infrastructure advancements, better model designs, and shifts to usage-based pricing could make AI more cost-effective. However, AI must also prove its value by reducing errors, minimizing human oversight, and integrating seamlessly into business operations. The future tipping point for AI adoption will be when it becomes both cheaper and more predictable than human labor at scale.