The video reviews the new AI-powered code editor, Windsurf Editor, developed by Codium, highlighting the host’s skepticism about its necessity and performance compared to existing options like Cursor. While the editor offers some useful features, the host ultimately finds it lacking in functionality and reliability, particularly for experienced developers, and prefers to continue using Cursor.
In the video, the host discusses the launch of a new AI-powered code editor called the Windsurf Editor, developed by the company Codium. The host expresses skepticism about the necessity of yet another AI code editor, given the existing options in the market. However, they are intrigued by Codium’s background in AI tools and are eager to explore what the Windsurf Editor has to offer. The video begins with a humorous self-promotion by the host, who mentions the challenges of securing sponsorships for their content.
The introduction of the Windsurf Editor features a presentation by Verun from Codium, who describes the editor as a tool that facilitates a seamless interaction between developers and AI. The concept of “AI flow” is introduced, which aims to create a collaborative environment where the AI can assist developers in real-time while also being capable of handling complex tasks independently. The host critiques the use of jargon like “AI agents” and “AI flow,” suggesting that these terms may be unnecessarily complicated.
As the host begins to test the Windsurf Editor, they highlight some of its features, such as the Cascade AI, which is designed to understand code context and assist with tasks like adding docstrings or managing files. However, the host expresses disappointment with the editor’s performance, noting that it struggles with larger codebases and often provides incorrect suggestions. They compare it unfavorably to another AI code editor, Cursor, which they have been using and find to be more reliable and efficient.
Throughout the video, the host shares their frustrations with the Windsurf Editor’s interface and functionality, including issues with hotkeys and the editor’s inability to accurately execute commands. They appreciate some of the editor’s features, such as the step-by-step guidance for setting up projects, but ultimately feel that the overall experience is lacking. The host emphasizes that while the Windsurf Editor may be beneficial for less experienced developers, it does not meet the needs of more proficient coders.
In conclusion, the host acknowledges the potential of the Windsurf Editor but expresses a preference for Cursor due to its superior performance and user experience. They encourage viewers to consider their own coding needs and experiences when evaluating AI code editors. The host’s final thoughts reflect a mix of hope for the future of AI tools in development and a critical assessment of the current offerings, ultimately deciding that they will stick with Cursor for the time being.