These might be my new favorite models (don’t sleep on Grok 4 Fast)

The video praises XAI’s Grok 4 Fast model for its remarkable improvements in speed, cost efficiency, and performance, highlighting its unified architecture and advanced tool use while acknowledging ongoing ethical challenges like high snitch rates. Overall, the presenter views Grok 4 Fast as a significant and practical advancement in AI, encouraging viewers to consider it despite some flaws.

The video discusses the new AI model Grok 4 Fast from XAI, highlighting its impressive advancements in cost efficiency, speed, and performance. The presenter admits to previously being skeptical of XAI and Grok models but is now genuinely impressed with how XAI has handled the rollout of Grok 4 Fast. Unlike its predecessor Grok 4, which was slow, expensive, and cumbersome to use, Grok 4 Fast offers comparable or better performance at a fraction of the cost—47 times cheaper—and with significantly faster response times. The model is praised for its token efficiency, achieving high benchmark scores while using fewer tokens, making it a highly cost-effective option for both enterprise and consumer applications.

One of the standout features of Grok 4 Fast is its unified architecture that combines reasoning and non-reasoning capabilities into a single model, controlled via system prompts. This innovation reduces latency and token costs, enabling smoother and more flexible interactions. The model also excels in tool use, such as code execution and web browsing, with fewer hallucinated tool calls compared to previous versions. Its state-of-the-art web and X (formerly Twitter) search capabilities allow it to perform multi-hop searches and synthesize real-time data effectively, although the cost of search queries remains relatively high. Despite this, Grok 4 Fast ranks highly in search performance benchmarks, outperforming many competitors.

The presenter emphasizes the transparency and collaboration XAI has shown by working closely with independent evaluators like Artificial Analysis, which lends credibility to the model’s performance claims. The video also highlights the shift in how intelligence versus cost is measured, moving from cost per token to the total cost of running benchmarks, which better reflects real-world usage. This change reveals Grok 4 Fast as an industry leader in cost efficiency, outperforming many other models in terms of value. The presenter expresses hope that other AI labs will follow XAI’s example in transparency and collaboration.

However, the video does not shy away from criticism. Grok 4 Fast, like its predecessor, scores poorly on the SnitchBench test, which measures how likely a model is to “snitch” or report sensitive information in certain scenarios. While Grok 4 Fast performs better than Grok 4 in some respects, it still exhibits a high snitch rate, especially under certain prompts and tool usage scenarios. This behavior aligns it with other models from Anthropic and similar labs, indicating ongoing challenges in balancing model intelligence and ethical safeguards.

In conclusion, the presenter is cautiously optimistic about Grok 4 Fast, calling it a significant improvement over previous Grok models and a strong contender in the AI model landscape. Its combination of speed, cost efficiency, and performance makes it a practical choice for everyday use, and the presenter encourages viewers not to overlook it. Despite some flaws, particularly in ethical behavior benchmarks, Grok 4 Fast represents a meaningful step forward for XAI and AI development in general. The video ends with a recommendation to try the model, noting that it is affordable and accessible, and a promise to monitor its performance and costs over time.